From: "Christophe Grandsire" <christophe.grandsire@...>
Subject: Re: Quick Intro
> En réponse à Joseph Fatula <fatula3@...>:
>
> >
> > But they _are_ superior!
>
> In what sense? Sorry to say so, but there's no language, whether natural
or
> artificial, which is superior than any other in general.
>
> Or did you mean arguing that for a specific
> > auxlang?
> >
>
> That too. But even arguing that auxlangs are superior than natlangs is
wrong
> and forbidden here.
>
> Christophe.
Sorry for the confusion, but I was just joking around.
Actually, I can't stand IALs as IALs, though some of them are interesting
simply as the author's own creative language.