Re: Abbreviation systems (was Re: Hello everybody)
From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 3:27 |
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 02:08:56 +0000 Tim May <butsuri@...>
writes:
> > My personal favorite language in the area of abbreviation is
> Hebrew, where you
> > get acronyms and such that become real words: Tanakh, Rashi,
> STA"M....
> >
> > ~Danny~
> That's most interesting. Is this due to special features of Hebrew
> phonetics/morphology/grammar, or just a tendency to choose usable
> acronyms?
> My own conlang has triconsonantal roots, but I really don't know
> anything about the semitic languages, so this is of interest to me.
-
It's due to the consonantal nature of the Hebrew alphabet. For instance,
_Tanakh_ stands for _Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim_. You take the first letter
of each word and string them together: TNK, and then insert vowels so
that it's readable. Since word-final /k/ in Hebrew is (almost) always
[x], TN"K (with the " multi-word abbreviation marker) is pronounced
[tanax] "Tanakh". /a/ is the most common vowel used in acronyms, as can
be seen in the others mentioned above:
RSh"Y "Rashi" [raSi], short for Rav Shelomo Yitzhhaqi. Since {y} in
Hebrew is used as a /i/-vowel marker, it is vocalized like that in the
abbreviation.
ST"M "Stam" [stam], short for (if i remember correctly) Seifer (Torah)
Tefillin Mezuza.
Other random abbreviations are MHR"L "Maharal", TRY"G "taryag", HN"L
"hanal", and RMBM "Rambam".
Abbreviations of single words, such as MS' for _mispar_ "number", are
marked with a single apostrophe and generally read as their full words.
-Stephen (Steg)
"no growth without assistance.
no action without reaction.
no desire without restraint.
now give yourself up and find yourself again.
there is a lesson for you."
~ Li, Mu Bai ; _Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon_
Reply