> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> wrote:
>> Roger Mills wrote:
>>>
>>> Sai wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Have you checked
>>>>
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/conscripts2.htm#conlangs?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Good heavens! all those conlangers/conscripters, and only
>>> 2 or 3 familiar names in the lot!! (or is that just my
>>> inattention?) where have they all been all these years?
>>
>> Which got me thinking: are there any con-stenographies?
>
> Aren't they all?
In the sense that all scripts are con-scripts.
I presume that "stenographies for conlangs" was intended.
Cheers,
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>