Re: introduction Middelsprake : artlangs & conlangs vs. auxlangs
|From:||Carsten Becker <naranoieati@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, June 29, 2005, 20:23|
From: "tomhchappell" <tomhchappell@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: introduction Middelsprake : artlangs & conlangs
> Ingmar's Middelsprake, as well as some others of his
> ConLangs, are
> also ArtLangs, in spite of not all being FictLangs; and in
> spite of
> the fact that MiddelSprake was constructed by a technique
> similar to
> one by which some InterLinguas are constructed. The
> differences are
> (1) Ingmar's purpose, (2) what he has done with the
> language, and (3)
> what he asks us to do with the language.
> Ingmar does seem to be involved with an AuxLang project;
> but MiddelSprake is not it.
> I think that those things about MiddelSprake that Ingmar
> has chosen to post here, I would welcome here.
Since I started this issue, I think I need to clarify that I
didn't mean any offense. I just wanted to notice Ingmar
because I didn't know his intention. It has actually
happened in the past that people asked about or promoted
their auxlangs here instead of on AUXLANG as they should.
Edatamanon le matahanarà benenoea eibenem ena Bahis Venena,
15-A8-58-5-4-3-2B ena Curan Tertanyan.