Re: introduction Middelsprake : artlangs & conlangs vs. auxlangs

From: "tomhchappell" <tomhchappell@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: introduction Middelsprake : artlangs & conlangs
vs. auxlangs

 > Ingmar's Middelsprake, as well as some others of his
 > ConLangs, are
 > also ArtLangs, in spite of not all being FictLangs; and in
 > spite of
 > the fact that MiddelSprake was constructed by a technique
 > similar to
 > one by which some InterLinguas are constructed.  The
 > differences are
 > (1) Ingmar's purpose, (2) what he has done with the
 > language, and (3)
 > what he asks us to do with the language.
 >
 > Ingmar does seem to be involved with an AuxLang project;
 > but MiddelSprake is not it.
 >
 > I think that those things about MiddelSprake that Ingmar
 > has chosen to post here, I would welcome here.

Since I started this issue, I think I need to clarify that I
didn't mean any offense. I just wanted to notice Ingmar
because I didn't know his intention. It has actually
happened in the past that people asked about or promoted
their auxlangs here instead of on AUXLANG as they should.

Carsten

--
Edatamanon le matahanarà benenoea eibenem ena Bahis Venena,
15-A8-58-5-4-3-2B ena Curan Tertanyan.

Reply