Dictionaries of agglutinating languages

Robert Hailman wrote:

> I haven't seen any dictionaries of any languages of a similar nature to
> yours, but my idea is to only put in words the meaning of which can't be
> derived easily by the root & the affixes; or perhaps you could only
> include the words using uncommon affixes.
Well, quite. The problem is in defining 'derived easily' and 'common'.
These qualities /can't/ be defined except as one end of a very fuzzy
and subjective continuum -- but to compile a dictionary I have to be
definitive.

--
web.       | Here and there I like to preserve a few islands of sanity
netyp.com/ | within the vast sea of absurdity which is my mind.
member/    | After all, you can't survive as an eight foot tall
dragon     | flesh eating dragon if you've got no concept of reality.