Re: Tech Umlaut
From: | BP Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, August 8, 2001, 19:27 |
At 10:44 2001-08-08 +0200, Daniel Andreasson wrote:
>I seem to remember reading something about this "brytning"
>having exceptions, but I can't find the source. I think
>u and o affect the e differently. CeCu should be CjuC and
>CeCo -> CjoC. But I also recall something about phonetic
>surroundings playing a part in this. (The word _þjúf_
>'thief' comes to mind.)
Apparent exceptions would traditionally be ascribed to dialect mixture or
analogy, but given that changes spread across vocabulary one item/one
individual at a time there may arise real exceptions.
Not all jV clusters in Scandinavian languages arise from breaking. Notably
the jó/jú found in words like þjófr--thiufwer--tjuv arose from older *iu
and *eu diphthongs.
Breaking was always caused by *a or *u following in the next syllable after
*e. Of these *e-a gave _ja_ or _jæ_ and *e-u gave _jo_ or _jø_; the ja/jæ
and jo/jø variation is dialect-dependent.
Consider the word _fjörðr which shows the following inflection(!):
NOM. fjörðr < *ferþuz
ACC. fjörð < *ferþu
DAT. firði < *ferþei
GEN. fjarðar < *ferþár
>Does anyone know what I'm talking about?
I know what breaking is, but I'm not sure what you are getting at.
/BP 8^)>
--
B.Philip Jonsson mailto:bpX@netg.se (delete X)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__
A h-ammen ledin i phith! \ \
__ ____ ____ _____________ ____ __ __ __ / /
\ \/___ \\__ \ /___ _____/\ \\__ \\ \ \ \\ \ / /
/ / / / / \ / /Melroch\ \_/ // / / // / / /
/ /___/ /_ / /\ \ / /Melarokko\_ // /__/ // /__/ /
/_________//_/ \_\/ /Eowine __ / / \___/\_\\___/\_\
Gwaedhvenn Angeliniel\ \______/ /a/ /_h-adar Merthol naun
~~~~~~~~~Kuinondil~~~\________/~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~
|| Lenda lenda pellalenda pellatellenda kuivie aiya! ||
"A coincidence, as we say in Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)