Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ    Attic   

Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))

From:deini nxtxr <deinx.nxtxr@...>
Date:Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 22:59
> [mailto:CONLANG@listserv.brown.edu] On Behalf Of Jorg
Rhiemeier
> > Phonologically it only has one really odd phoneme. > > It's not that Klingon has bizarre phonemes that makes the > phonology unnatural, it is the unsystematic jumble of > phonemes it has. If you mark the phonemes of a natlang in > the IPA chart, you usually get a semi-regular array of > phonemes. For example, the stops may come in voiced/ > voiceless pairs such as /b/:/p/, /d/:/t/, /g/:/k/ etc. > There may be gaps and odd bits, but in Klingon you get a > complete mess of a phoneme inventory.
Yes, but is any of it really unpronounceable by humans? Only the /t_l_h/ phoneme seemed far-fetched and I can think of one language, Nahuatl, that is close with /t_l/.
> > > The only > > grammatical thing that I see being "different" are the verb > prefixes > > that represent subject-object combinations. > > Many languages mark person and number of both subject and > object on the verb, and while most of those languages use > fairly transparent morpheme combinations for that purpose, > the boundaries can be blurred to a large extent by sound > changes. However, in Klingon, the prefixes seem completely > arbitrary, which is not very likely.
That's what I meant by being very different. I know there are natural languages with subject and object marked but in Klingon it's a single prefix to represent both, and it's not systematic so each pair must be learned separately.
> > Beyond that I'd say the > > lexicon would be the worst part to learn because it's rooted
in the
> > fictional Klingon culture. > > Of course the lexicon is rooted in Klingon culture, and > that's indeed a *strong* point - because Klingon is a > fictional language and not an auxlang. But for an auxlang, > the Klingon lexicon would definitely be suboptimal.
Right, it wouldn't make a very desireable auxlang. I would say the same about Tolkien's language too. In either case though, a human vocabulary could arise if enough people learned and started using these languages.

Reply

Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>