From: | Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Saturday, June 19, 2004, 1:51 |
"Mark P. Line" wrote:> That dataset is way too small to be able to claim there's no "ti". Also, > we have to ask ourselves why the Firchows would never have mentioned such > an obvious allophonic alternation. I don't think we can assume they > "missed" it.Unless I overlooked it, I didn't see *any* description of allophones.