Re: What's a gender?
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <conlang@...> |
Date: | Thursday, December 21, 2006, 14:04 |
caeruleancentaur skrev:
> <Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> wrote:
>
>> What constitutes grammatical gender? Does there have to
>> be an acknowledged connection to biological sex, as in
>> most European langs?
>
>> Anyway, just wondering what the criteria are. If my
>> conlang has noun classes, does it therefore have gender,
>> or does it depend on more specific details of how the
>> classes work?
>
> A good question. A corollary would be: How does one
> differentiate, or reconcile, gender and declension?
>
> Latin has 5 declensions and 3 genders for nouns (4 if you
> include the common gender), but only 3 declensions for
> adjectives.
>
> Is gender determined by the adjective used with the noun?
> If memory serves, only the 5th declension (-es) has nouns
> only of one gender, feminine.
>
> 1st: puella bona - poeta bonus. Both nouns are 1st
> declension, but the adjectives are 1st and 2nd.
I guess classical grammarians didn't employ any formal
or syntactic criterion, but rather their native speaker
knowledge; to them nouns 'were' of a certain gender,
end of story.
If I were to pick a syntactic criterion I'd probably pick
which form of certain determiners like _hic, iste, ille,
ipse, qui_ a noun takes, exactly because adjectives come in
two flavors, one of which (3d declension adjectives)
distinguish only two genders.
AFMOC none of my a-priori conlangs has gender as a category,
although the Sohloçan languages distinguish between animate
and inanimate categories, according to which different nouns
behave differently syntactically, and since there is no hard
and fast 'scientific' criterion a noun belongs to (e.g.
celestial bodies, fire, water, bodies of water, metals,
houses and musical instruments are animate, while bugs are
inanimate) I guess the distinction borders on a gender
distinction.
--
/BP 8^)
--
B.Philip Jonsson mailto:melrochX@melroch.se (delete X)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Truth, Sir, is a cow which will give [skeptics] no more milk,
and so they are gone to milk the bull."
-- Sam. Johnson (no rel. ;)