Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: USAGE: front vowel tensing [was: English notation]

From:dirk elzinga <dirk.elzinga@...>
Date:Friday, June 29, 2001, 17:32
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, tristan alexander mcleay wrote:

> > Not necessarily. Many varieties of Western American English > > (including the one I speak, and presumably the one Tom speaks) > > has front vowel tensing before the velar nasal. This means that > > the vowels in 'peek' and 'pink' are distinguished only by > > nasality: 'pink' has a nasal vowel and 'peek' does not. Likewise > > 'bake' and 'bank'. > > > So the /&/ goes to /ej/? Some american i talk about the phonetics of our > englishes with claims he uses [&j] (but only allophonic) before /N/, and > i have [&i] there too, which means it collapses with /&i/ and is sung as > /E:/, which means in certain styles of singing (like when singing the > Anthem), the RP vowels /eI/, /E@/, and {/&/ before an /N/} all collapse > into the same sound. (And so do /OI/ (my /Oi/), /O@/, /O:/, and /Q:/)
Yes; /&/ is realized as [ej] before the velar nasal in my dialect. Singing is not a good test for dialect distinctions or neutralizations since the singing voice makes different demands on the vocal tract than speaking. And let's not even get into the low back vowels; the dialectology of English back vowels is a nightmare. Even in my own Utah English (where the distinction between [A/Q] has supposedly been neutralized) the back vowels still have some surprises.
> And is there a difference between /ej/ and /ei/? Why is it that > americans tend to discribe the diphthongs as ending in a consonant, and > brits and aussies and others use a vowel? is this just some tradition > designed to confuse the crap out of me?
Yes. It's been designed with precisely you in mind. In my own English transcription practice, I use glide symbols in diphthongs and reserve a sequence of vowel symbols to represent vowels in hiatus. Re-lurking now (I've got work to do), Dirk -- Dirk Elzinga dirk.elzinga@m.cc.utah.edu "The strong craving for a simple formula has been the undoing of linguists." - Edward Sapir