Underlining
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <conlang@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 14:33 |
Philip Newton skrev:
> On 4/11/07, T. A. McLeay <conlang@...> wrote:
>> [*]: I find Wikipedia, when I'm not logged in and running
>> on a browser other than my normal ones, particularly
>> irritating, because you often get [[annoying]] [[links]]
>> [[like]] [[this]], and with no underlining it's
>> impossible to tell that each word is a separate link,
>> rather than just one long one.
>
> Same here. Plus I find that links that are underlined are
> more distinct from surrounding text than links that are
> merely a different colour. Rather annoying choice
> Wikipedia made.
I agree entirely of course. That's why have altered things
accordingly in my user style:
a [href] { text-decoration: underline }
and always log into my user account, which I can do on any
computer. The same goes for fonts, as I prefer to view
things in a serif font, though at the uni I usually have
to settle for Arial Unicode MS, which at least is better
than boxes.
--
/BP mailto:melrochX@melroch.se (delete X!)
--
As Max Weinreich said (in Yiddish), a language is
a dialect with an army and a navy. Which means that
Afrikaans is now a dialect of Xhosa.--John Cowan
Reply