Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 22/06/99 22:40:14 , Charles a =E9crit :
> > > Since I've passed the limit of my understanding about serial verb stuf=
f,
> >=20
> > you obviously worked a lot on the topic.
> =20
> Whole minutes! Could spoil that by visiting a library, probably.
> But the old books are useless and the new ones are expensive.
> If I believed the bioprogram theory, there's no need; just do it.
> =20
i believe that too. but then it takes me years to end up with awkward=20
theories that are barely mentionned in lingo books i can barely understand.=20
so i'm going to visit a library this summer. did you ever gather on a webpag=
e=20
the list of all the lingo urls you mention in your posts ?
> > > I'll just assume two types are enough, and use it till it breaks.
> >=20
> > do you mean one compound type and one independent type ?
> =20
> Yes. Last year I had three: 1) plain verb, 2) adjectival-participial,
> 3) adverbial-prepositional. Maybe now dispense with #2 or merge it
> with #3, as in English ... that sounds like a very bad idea. Arrrg!
> =20
neat. where are your pro-tools to tie plain verbs to their respective actors =
?
> > this made me decide to create a new creole-type of conlang based on wha=
t=20
> we
> > discussed. i do that when i have time.
> =20
> Well, I'm waiting.=20
do you know somewhere i could get a conlanging full-time job (preferably one=20
to design pseudo-linguistic theories) ?
Let's see your serial theory in practice.
> No cheating by just copying Haitian.
> =20
mi promis no go chit with kopi spik hawaii. ;-)
mathias