Re: Betreft: Re: k(w)->p
From: | Rob Nierse <rnierse@...> |
Date: | Thursday, January 27, 2000, 12:44 |
>>> Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> 01/27 3:19 >>>
Ed Heil wrote:
> > An example of the other way round (p>k_w) is in Iroquoian
> > Languages (they lack bilabial stops & nasals):
> > penny -> k_we:ni etc.
>
> I hereby withdraw my comment that I found k(w)->p bizarre. Rob has
> just provided an example that completely eclipses its weirdness.
Seems pretty logical if /p/ does not exist. What's really interesting,
IMO, is forms like
Christmas -> kalikimaka (Hawai'ian) where /s/ becomes /k/. Of course,
neither /s/ nor /t/ exists in Hawai'ian.
----->
This reminds of some other features:
- there is an Amerindian language that lacks nasals.
They say "waSitoq_0" instead of "Washington".
That is something that struck me: a dental n replaced by
a rounded uvular stop.
Question: Does anybody know what language this is? I forgot the name
- A (common) change that surprises me is [s] --> [h].
That sounds weird to me
Rob