Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

>
> > How about "(The) International Bulletin of Language Construction"? It's
> > a bit more pretentious with the article, and I don't know whether
> > pretentiousness is a good thing (in my opinion it's not, but YMMV).
>
>It is a bit pretentious, indeed, with or without the article. But that
>effect
>is at least partly undone by translating it into a conlang.
>Many conlangs (including mine) don't have an article, anyway.
>
>Jan
You know I just realized something: in English, that title of yours may seem
awfully amibguous. With the word order you chose, "international" looks like
it describes "language" and not "bulletin." You don't want that, unless
you're aiming to make this bulletin solely about auxlangs. I'd say go with
"International Bulletin of Language Construction," as someone suggested
before.

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com