At 21:31 12/10/98 -0000, you wrote:
>Christophe wrote :
>
>> Why not using reduplication? (Mathias just lent me a book on
>> Sumerian grammar, and it uses it very much) I think it could be used with
>> roots (if we use only one- or two-syllabe roots, more would be too much).=
Or
>> what about using reduplication of the first syllabe for a meaning and the
>> reduplication of the second for another: benol > bebenol > benolnol.=
There's
>> a problem with single-syllabe roots, but we can add a new rule or make
>> meanings that can't have both reduplications. We're free!
>>
>> Christophe Grandsire
>> |Sela Jemufan Atlinan=
C.G.
>>
>> homepage:=
http://www.bde.espci.fr/homepage/Christophe.Grandsire/index.html
>>
>
>Christophe !
>
>T'arretes tout de suite tes conneries et tu me rends ce bouquin=
IMMEDIATEMENT !
>
Viens le chercher, si tu l'oses ! (dis, tous les conlangers n'ont
pas appris le fran=E7ais ? Ils vont se demander ce qui se passe. Et si on
for=E7ait tout le monde =E0 =E9crire en fran=E7ais ? Je plaisante).
>Riduplication partielle ? Jusqu'oy on va comme ga, je te demande un peu ?
>
>Mamathithiasas
>
Je ne r=E9dupliquerai pas mon pr=E9nom (on m'a suffisamment appel=E9
Cricri d'amour =E0 l'=E9poque d'"H=E9l=E8ne et les gar=E7ons" !).
>;-)
>
>
>
>-----
>See the original message at=
http://www.egroups.com/list/conlang/?start=3D17179
Christophe Grandsire
|Sela Jemufan Atlinan C.G.
homepage: http://www.bde.espci.fr/homepage/Christophe.Grandsire/index.html