Optimum number of symbols,
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Friday, May 24, 2002, 3:47 |
Kendra scripsit:
> How is english more isolating than chinese? (just curious :)
It has more inflectional morphemes than English does (though in both
cases we are talking less than twenty).
I agree that it's impossible to count vocabulary in a cross-linguistic
way, but I do think that English has a large vocabulary as languages go,
because of its mixed Germanic and Romance lexicon, and its incredibly
subtle if rather pointless lexical distinctions. A member of this list,
whose English is normally very good, used "grab" a while back where
"grasp" would have been the Right Thing. I wrote privately pointing
this out, and got a reply to the effect of, I do appreciate the help,
but I will never be able to remember this distinction: it is too subtle
(and pointless)! (Another example: "I do appreciate" sounds sincere,
whereas a simple "I appreciate" might be sincere or sarcastic. Who's to
know these things outside the L1 community?)
--
John Cowan <jcowan@...> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
Replies