Re: Towards a less Preliminary Sketch (was Re: Preliminary Sketch)
|From:||Rene Uittenbogaard <ruittenb@...>|
|Date:||Friday, December 10, 2004, 17:25|
Paul Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 11:12:57 -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 05:16:42PM -0500, Paul Bennett wrote:
>>> tj /c_+C_+)/
>>> ch /tS)/
>> Whoa, this is a hard distinction for me to pronounce.
> One is apical, the other is laminal. One has the teeth closed, the other
Huh? [c] is apical? Or [c_+]? I always interpreted [c] as laminal, and
was guessing [c_+] is also laminal. Let me disambiguate by writing [c_a]
and [c_m] (one of which will be redundant).
I have no difficulty distinguishing [c_+_mC_+_m)] from [tS].. it is
quite similar to [t_jj_0)], and [t_jj)] occurs in Dutch.