Re: Crazy-yet-legal constructs (was: Re: LIFO languages (was Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?))

that just king of killed my brain, does any one have words that can do stuff
like that in thier conlang? I can't think of one in mine right now.

Sorry, I'll repeat that with punctuation: Smith, while Jones had had "had
> had", had had "had"; "had had" had been the correct answer.
>
> ;-)
>
> --
> src/
>