Inherently unspeakable grammar

> The unitary term language hides the interesting extra-esthetic
factors:
> syntactic/semantic closeness to English, vocabulary size and scope,
> grammatical power, learnability by humans (Jacques Guy has posted some
> wonderful grammar sketches of adequate communication systems that
would be
> inherently unspeakable by beings with our nueral wiring).
   Not to change the subject, but since I already have, would some
kind person repost those examples? My curtuosity is piqued!
   :Peter
==
 _____      _____________________________________________________
   |  \   O) ...for Christ plays in ten thousand places,         )
  _|__/    | Lovely in limbs, and lovely in eyes not his         |
 / |eter   | To the Father through the features of men's faces.  |
 | |       | -Gerard Manley Hopkins, "As Kingfishers Catch Fire" |
 \___lark  (_____________________________________________________(O

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com