Re: USAGE: Circumfixes

Thomas R. Wier wrote:

>
>
>Being written in a certain fashion has nothing at all to do with
>a morpheme's status as a clitic.  Latin -que, like Greek -te, is
>a clitic that joins two noun phrases together, and because it has
>scope over phrases rather than words, it must be a morphosyntactic
>word.  (Same goes for English <'s>)
>
>
Indeed.  To confirm this, the Sanskrit equivalent, 'ca' is usually
written seperately, in the latin script(whether it is written that way
in Devanágari or not depends on how the preceding word ends) .