Re: Tech: Unicode (was...)

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 07:10:42PM -0500, Mark P. Line wrote:
> Philippe Caquant said:
> > Great. So I managed to make some little Word macro at
> > last. Probably awfully badly written, but this is my
> > first trial for such a thing !
> >
> > If you paste in a Word document an entry like:
> >
> > 410,411,412,413,414,415,416,417,420,20,661,662,663,664,665,666,667,668,669
>
>
> I love it!
>
> Can we use that for all of our English text as well?
53,75,72,65,21,20,20,49,20,68,69,67,68,6c,79,20,72,65,63,6f,6d,6d,65,6e,64
20,69,74,21,d,a,2d,4d,61,72,6b

Reply