Re : (LONG) Sketch by a novice, please criticize/help/flame/etc
|From:||From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <lassailly@...>|
|Date:||Monday, September 13, 1999, 19:48|
Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 13/09/99 19:47:44 , Paul a =E9crit :
> Here is an up-to-date sketch of a foetal conlang (work in progress, not a=20CL=20
> zygotes!) that I've been monkeying around with for a while on and off
> Please post any and all comments, especially as regards my horrendous and
> probably inconsistent terminology.
i feel like you captured the essential concepts of speech (essential
aspects, attributive links, discourse markers, etc.). detailing "usual asset=
from "item one produces" etc. shows you have earnestly introspected
the most important features of language for a long time with humble heart,
beyond conventional and sterile categories. it is no common navelistic
but a very wise and admirably structured conlang.
BTW did you ever read an inuktitut grammar ?