Re : (LONG) Sketch by a novice, please criticize/help/flame/etc

Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 13/09/99 19:47:44  , Paul a =E9crit :

> Here is an up-to-date sketch of a foetal conlang (work in progress, not a=20
CL=20
> for
>  zygotes!) that I've been monkeying around with for a while on and off
> =20
>  Please post any and all comments, especially as regards my horrendous and
>  probably inconsistent terminology.
i feel like you captured the essential concepts of speech (essential
aspects, attributive links, discourse markers, etc.). detailing "usual asset=
s"
from "item one produces" etc. shows you have earnestly introspected
the most important features of language for a long time with humble heart,
beyond conventional and sterile categories. it is no common navelistic
but a very wise and admirably structured conlang.
BTW did you ever read an inuktitut grammar ?

mathias