Re: OT: auxlangers vs. artlangers (was OT: lingua fracas)
From: | Stone Gordonssen <stonegordonssen@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 19, 2003, 16:06 |
>This is also a valid point. The vast majority of those subscribing to the
>general idea of an artificial IAL probably feel that one of the proposals
>(and for the largest fraction, this proposal is Esperanto)
>is good enough to fulfil its purpose even if it isn't perfect, and have no
>eggs to fry in the pan of those who battle each other on their proposals.
Indeed, and even thatough I was dissatisfied with the foibles of Esperanto,
a short membership on AUXLANG, where I was treated daily to the equivalent
of children attacking each other with their toys, sent me back top
Esperanto.
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail