> Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 29/10/99 02:03:26 , vous avez =E9crit :
>
> > > That's probably a clitic pronoun - like in French (am I right,
> > > Mathias?).
>
> no, no. i was wrong with (en)clitics. first because clitics cannot be
> inflected for definition. so Paul's (?) little front words are articles
like
> you said. of course you know that better than us (te, ten, ter etc.).
> second because Didier reminds me that my teachers
> were wrong calling them enclitics, they should say post- or proclitics.
> so i guess reflexive pronoun is enough, don't you think ?
>
> mathias
I think you may be thinking of "particles" here. I don't think there is =
a
restriction on clitic inflections.
David