Re: Conlangs symposium - media publicity?
| From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, January 20, 2006, 17:55 |
|---|
On 1/20/06, Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...> wrote:
[gmail reply-to behaviour]
> I *think* I've got mine fixed, but I'm not sure.
It does look that way.
> Actually, I would consider this a defect
> in either the listserv software or the conlang
> listserv settings, that it doesn't override reply-to
> when forwarding messages.
It may have been a conscious decision, as there are cases where people
might legitimately employ Reply-To -- overwriting that would give no
way to contact the author at the address they read replies at.
That decision is a bit unfortunate, though, in the face of a client
which always inserts a -- completely needless, IMO -- Reply-To header.
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Watch the Reply-To! (?)