Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: _the_ lateral fricative?

From:Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>
Date:Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 20:43
On Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at 04:47 , Paul Roser wrote:

> On Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at 12:25 , Jonathyn Bet'nct wrote: > >>> I have another one: >>> >>> * You think the lateral fricative is the coolest sound in language. >> >> _the_ lateral fricative? There are two of the critters; some languages, >> such as Zulu and Xhosa, have them both (voiceless and voiced). > > Well, voiced and voiceless alveolar in most Bantu languages that have > lateral fricatives. But others, mostly voiceless, exist:
Yes, thanks for reminding me. I had known others were possible and that at least one other was actually attested. I guess I had a 'senior moment' when I wrote ;) In fact I had a voiceless palatal fricative in a conlang once (because I found it easy to pronounce & like it - also the phontactics of the language demanded it) & wondered if it occurred in a natlang only to be told that it occurred in Icelandic. Good to know it's down there in Nigeria as well. I bet they aren't the only two examples either.
> 1) voiceless palatal lateral fricative in Bura (Nigeria) > > 2) voiceless retroflex lateral fricative in A-Hmao (and some other Hmong > dialects in SW China)
Good.
> 3) voiceless velar or pre-velar lateral fricative in Archi (Caucasus)
Good.
> 4) Toda (Southern India) has alveolar and retroflex fricatives > which can be voiced or voiceless (positional allophones)
Excellent :)
> 5) Nii/Wahgi (Papua New Guinea) which has three laterals, dental, > alveolar, and velar, which may have voiceless fricative allophones > (according to some descriptions)
Even better. In fact I notice the IPA matrix has empty cells for retroflex, palatal, velar and uvular lateral fricatives - just no symbols yet. The only two IPA does provide may be dental, alveolar or postalveolar (voiced & unvoiced). So it seems that there are 14 of the critters (tho I am not sure how uvular laterals are made) :) A language could have 14 lateral fricatives - but that's probably over-doing it, tho theoretically possible. However, having something like 8 seems perfectly feasible to me. So what's cool about just having one? :) Ray =============================================== http://home.freeuk.com/ray.brown ray.brown@freeuk.com =============================================== Anything is possible in the fabulous Celtic twilight, which is not so much a twilight of the gods as of the reason." [JRRT, "English and Welsh" ]

Reply

Rene Uittenbogaard <ruittenb@...>