Re: CHAT: Conlang Cycles
|From:||Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...>|
|Date:||Friday, December 13, 2002, 7:46|
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 10:01:32 -0500, Keenan <makeenan@...> wrote:
>Jeff Jones wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 10:54:58 -0500, Keenan <makeenan@...> wrote:
>> "Lablang" is what I use when I bother to use a term. Most of my languages
>> are lablangs.
I don't think I replied to this part.
There's not a lot to tell, since I usually get stuck early in the
MNCL was intended to try out agglutination, ergative syntax, and a couple
'Yemls uses the basic alphabet as a syllabary. Upper and lower case are
distinct. The written form is fairly compact, but that's partly due to a
somewhat ambiguous syntax. It's also supposed to have a "fun" vocabulary,
which makes creating new words even more challenging.
Rubaga takes classical Latin and applies a certain set of sound changes to
see what else is affected. I need to do more research before going further
What little online documentation I have is out of date.