Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
From: | Eric Christopherson <raccoon@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 9, 2000, 6:40 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On
> Behalf Of Robert Hailman
> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2000 4:38 PM
> To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
> Subject: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
>
>
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@...>
> Poster: Robert Hailman <robert@...>
> Subject: Re: CHAT: "have a nice day"
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
>
> andrew wrote:
> >
> > Am 03/06 17:30 Robert Hailman yscrifef:
> >
> > > To me, "Good day" suggests a proper Englishman of the 19th century who
> > > is too proper to say anything other than "Good day, sir" when he gets
> > > angry.
> > >
> > You have never had an Australasian address you with "G'day, mate", then,
> > eh? And yes, we say "eh" as well.
> >
> I can't say I've ever spoken to an Australian who said that. My science
> teacher was Australian last year, and didn't say it at all.
>
> Most Canadians don't say 'eh?', that's only on TV, eh?
>
> --
> Robert
I like 'eh' myself. It seems like a good parallel to 'no?'/'non?' in Romance
languages and 'ne?' in Japanese. A very useful particle :)
Eric Christopherson / *Aiworegs Ghristobhorosyo suHnus
raccoon@elknet.net