Herman Miller scripsit:
> Interesting. Jarrda uses essentially the same solution as Loglan, in the
> case of words such as "large". But "red" is specifically defined as a
> particular frequency of light. If you claim that something is "red" in
> Jarrda, what that basically means is that it is more similar to the
> definition of "red" than it is to any of the other words in the same
> category.
The trouble is that something can look red without reflecting that
frequency of light at all. The human vision system is extremely complex.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin