Re: VOS
From: | Jim Grossmann <steven@...> |
Date: | Thursday, April 27, 2000, 5:35 |
Hi there,
Why would VOS imply ergative?
Is this a common tendency?
AFAIK, natlangs with ergative argument schemes mark ergativity
morphologically.
I suppose you could have ergative word order, where ergatives come before
the verb and absolutives come after.
BILLY SAW SALLY.
JUMPED SALLY.
Are there any natlangs that do this?
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "BP Jonsson" <bpj@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 11:05 AM
Subject: VOS
> I read somewhere that Mayan is VOS. I suppose this really means it's
> ergative, doesn't it?
>
> What other VOS languages are there? Are they ergative or non-ergative?
>
>
>
> /BP
>
> B.Philip Jonsson
> mailto:bpj@netg.se
> mailto:melroch@my-deja.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~__
> Anant' avanaute quettalmar! \
> \
> __ ____ ____ _____________ ___ __ __ __ / /
> \ \/___ \\__
> \ /___ _____/\ \\__ \\ \ \ \\ \ / /
> / / / / / \ / /Melroch\
> \_/ // / / // / / /
> / /___/ /_ / /\ \ / /Melarocco\_ // /__/ // /__/
> /
> /_________//_/ \_\/ /Eowine__ / / \___/\_\\___/\_\
> I neer
> Pityancalimeo\ \_____/ /ar/ /_atar Mercasso
> naan
> ~~~~~~~~~Cuinondil~~~\_______/~~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~
> || Lenda lenda
> pellalenda pellatellenda cuivie aiya! ||
> "A coincidence, as we say in
> Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)