| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 18:57 |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:33:10PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:> RM> Another thing that happens is t > ?, [....ni?.dZi] > > All interesting ideas, but if the /t/ becomes [t], why is there still a > [d] before the [Z] in that case?Er, I meant, "...if the /t/ becomes [?],..."
| Roger Mills <rfmilly@...> |