Re: Exit Methkaeki, (re)enter Mephali
From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 21:04 |
RM> Another thing that happens is t > ?, [....ni?.dZi]
MJR> if the /t/ becomes [?], why is there still a [d] before the [Z] in
MJR> that case?
RM> Ummmm...--the sequence was something like this:
Ah, a continuation of the sequence from the earlier alternative, not
another parallel track. Got it. So [T.Z] -> [t.Z] -> [t.dZ)] ->
[?.dZ)]
RM> Maybe more accurately, it could also be: 1. voice assim. nit.Zi > nid.Zi
RM> 2. affrication Z > dZ/[coronal stop/nasal]__
RM> 3. [stop-a][stop-a] > [?][stop-a].
RM> This is comparable to the behavior of geminate voiced stops in Buginese:
What's Buginese?
RM> A forward assim. of nit.Zi > nit.Si > ni.tS)i would also be possible, but
RM> for some reason I just don't like that.
Well, that's what makes horse races. Artlangs always come back to
aesthetics ultimately. :)
Thanks!
-Marcos
Reply