Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: Feature geometry for uvulars/pharyngeals

From:JS Bangs <jaspax@...>
Date:Friday, June 27, 2003, 17:02
Julien Eychenne sikyal:

> There is an excellent article about feature geometry in _The Handbook of > Phonological Theory_, edited by > John Goldsmith. This article is _Internal Organization of Speech Sounds_ > by Clements and Hume.
I have this book--and this is the very article from which I drew my first two responses! I agree that this is an excellent resource, as is the enire volume.
> absolutely sure). They present another way > to do it, wich is an idea of McCarthy. Instead of having a place node > dominating [labial], [coronal], [dorsal], and > [pharyngeal], he proposes that Place dominates an oral node which it > the sister of the [pharyngeal] feature.
This is the general schema that I have been using. It seems quite reasonable to separate Place into Oral and [pharyngeal].
> The good point is that distinguishing pharyngeals from uvualars is > then straightforward : the former have just the [pharyngeal] feature, > while the latter have both [dorsal] and [pharyngeal]. Thus, pharyngeals > can be more transparent to phonological processes as they have no ORAL > feature. Maybe it could be what you need ?
Ah. The section on this in Clements and Hume is very brief, and if they mention how to distinguish uvulars from velars I must have missed it. This does seem like a good solution, as it allows for natural classes of uvulars and pharyngeals or of uvulars and velars.
> I don't know whether it is of interest, but here is how I would do, in > an element-based framework : > [snip interesting example]
I have never studied element-based phonology, but my general impressions of it are negative . . . I'm most likely being unfair. Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu http://students.washington.edu/jaspax/ http://students.washington.edu/jaspax/blog Jesus asked them, "Who do you say that I am?" And they answered, "You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground of our being, the kerygma in which we find the ultimate meaning of our interpersonal relationship." And Jesus said, "What?"

Reply

Julien Eychenne <je@...>