Re: THEORY: Voiceless vowels [was Re: Missing Parts]
|From:||Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...>|
|Date:||Saturday, June 29, 2002, 21:50|
Roger Mills wrote:
> How about final nasal plus vowel? I'd assume no devoicing there.
> What is the rule for word-medial devoicing? My impression is "between
> voiceless stops", but how about ...s__[vl.stop]... ? I also have the
> impression it involves /i, u/ more than the low vowels??
It's only high vowels, /u/ more than /i/, spoken more than sung. Not
sure how formality plays into this. It's between voiceless consonants
or after a voiceless consonant word-finally. So, _sutoraiku_ (borrowing
of "strike"), for example, is often pronounced [sM_0toraik_0] (or even
Incidentally, _u_ between identical voiceless consonants is very rare.
It tends to lead to geminates, for example, _gaku_ "study" + _kou_
"school" -> _gakkou_ "school", boku "wood(en)" + ken "sword" -> bokken
"wooden practice sword"
> A friend once maintained that the "correct" pronunciation of _sukiyaki_ was
> more like "skiyaki", (I suppose [s=kiyaki]) which seems possible though I've
> never noticed it e.g. in Japanese restaurants.
Well, [sMkiyaki] isn't actually wrong (I have, in fact, heard that
pronunciation once or twice), but [sM_0] or [s=] would be more common.
In fact, I think the voiced vowel would mostly only be used by children
or in song.
"There's no such thing as 'cool'. Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42