| From: | Rodlox <rodlox@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thursday, December 9, 2004, 0:13 |
not kidding, folks. In order to have a language, does a species first need to be able to lie/decieve/trick/fool/bluff others of their species? *If* a deception-free species could & did have a language, would it be easily translatable? food for thought, yes?
| Chris Bates <chris.maths_student@...> | |
| Remi Villatel <maxilys@...> |