|Date:||Thursday, December 9, 2004, 0:13|
not kidding, folks. In order to have a language, does a species first need to be able to lie/decieve/trick/fool/bluff others of their species? *If* a deception-free species could & did have a language, would it be easily translatable? food for thought, yes?
|Chris Bates <chris.maths_student@...>|
|Remi Villatel <maxilys@...>|