> M'D > nd
> MB > mv
> M'T > nt > nd
> M'C > nc > ng
> MPS > ns > nz
> MPT > mp > mb
> M'L > mbl > mbu
> M'R > ndr
> M'N > mr > mbr
What I see here is a great deal of inconsistency of process. I would
suspect more homogeneity:
md > nd ; mb > mb
mt > nt > nd ; mc > nc > ng
mps > ns > nz ; mpt > nt > nd
mn > nn
> Now looking at this it seems rather chaotic. Here are some other
facts about the lang that make thees > canges trouble me:
> QU > p before aou (and f before ie)
This isn't too too weird.
> CT > p
This is bizarre. Natlang influence? What motivates this soundchange?
You're pulling a feature out of nowhere and deleting a couple... it's
quite odd.
---
Shreyas Sampat