Re: SV: Re: Replies to my Introduction
From: | Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <lloannna@...> |
Date: | Saturday, January 11, 2003, 0:19 |
Oh!!! THAT, I've already done. I didn't know that the word for that was
"phonology"
Anyway, for Sarah1 in particular, that's all really organized. LangMaker
made me do it, even if I hadn't been inclined to. I wanted to make the
language sound like my username (lloannna) could have come from it; so
there's a lot of "oa" everywhere. Is there some set way that you're
supposed to represent phonology, when discussing a new language?
I suppose I really ought to give that language a better name, already.
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen
lloannna@surfside.net
http://lloannna.blogspot.com
http://www.geocities.com/lloannna.geo
"There are some things that it is better to begin than to refuse, even
though the end may be dark."
-- J.R.R. Tolkien
> -----Original Message-----
> Behalf Of Michael Fors
>
> Hi Sarah!
>
> There is something that you've forgotten. That is the phonology
> of the languages. The first thing one should do before getting
> into grammatics and words, is to decide what sounds that should
> be in the language. If you create it entirely from scratch, you
> could do as I do. I take the IPA-chart and go from there. =) Not
> that I've made any language yet, but I'm getting there. If you
> want it to be based on another language, real or created, you
> could study sound changes and apply them.
>
> Just some friendly advice from a person. There are many many
> people here that know far more than I do about these things.
>
>
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]
Replies