Re: USAGE: syllables
From: | JS Bangs <jaspax@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 12, 2003, 20:58 |
Mark J. Reed sikyal:
> > Maximally, there are 7 or so sonority classes in any language, though some
> > languages may distinguish more. In order from least to most sonorous,
> > these are:
> >
> > 1) Stops
> > 2) Fricatives
> > 3) Nasals
> > 4) Liquids ([l], [r], and the like)
> > 5) High vocoids ([i],[u],[j],[w], etc.)
> > 6) Mid vocoids ([e],[o], etc.)
> > 7) Low vocoids ([a])
> (snip)
>
> A question: is the above sequence universal? My subjective experience
> in producing the sounds would lead me to say that fricatives were
> more sonorous than nasals or liquids, and it's difficult to rank
> the latter two at all; they seem about equivalent.
Eh? If a fricative is more sonorous than a nasal, then [nfip] should be
easier to pronounce than [fnip], which is false to me. Likewise, is [rma]
easier than [mra]? In any case, the cross-linguistic evidence is strongly
in favor of the above ranking being the universal unmarked case.
Individual exceptions apply, like English speakers who can say [sta] but
not [tsa].
> > I recently discovered that Old Yivrian is best described with three sonority
> > classes:
>
> The grouping of [l] with stops rather than with [r]/[w] does seem odd.
> But what is Old Yivrian? I've not heard of it.
The ancestor of Yivrian, my main conlang. The grouping of [l] with the
stops is indeed odd, and provides support for the "Obstruent L" theory
that I've bandied about sporadically. Basically, when it comes to syllable
structure, /l/ consistently seems to pattern with the stops and not the
liquids, almost all the way into Modern Yivrian. Thus, the Obstruent L
hypothesis suggests that /l/ was articulatorily a stop at some point in
the past. I don't know what it was, though, since all of the related
languages that I know of have *l reflexed as plain ol' /l/.
Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu
http://students.washington.edu/jaspax/
http://students.washington.edu/jaspax/blog
Jesus asked them, "Who do you say that I am?"
And they answered, "You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground
of our being, the kerygma in which we find the ultimate meaning of our
interpersonal relationship."
And Jesus said, "What?"
Replies