Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness

From:Jake X <starvingpoet@...>
Date:Wednesday, April 2, 2003, 21:40
Okay, here goes:
[an'dr`e:as r`ot]
> Quoting Jake X <starvingpoet@...>: > > > ['andr\e@s r\out]
I meant [an'dre@s]. I don't think I ever said it [wIT D@ em'f&:s@s an D@ r\O_@N sI'l&b@l].
> > > When you say it, I think this goes for all the few sets of twins > > I've > > known > > > (which, oddly, all have been single-egg twins). > > That may not be true. I have gone years knowing sets of fraternal > > twins > > without > > knowing that about them, to be surprised later. They just assume you > > know, > > and you > > just walk blindly. > > > > At least I do. > > I'm fairly certain I've never known _a set_ of fraternal twins. It's of
> entirely possible that some people I've known not too well may have had > fraternal twins (or even single-egg ones) I've never heard of.
That's happened to me too. I was good friends with a guy once a whole summer before I found out he had a twin sister.
> Interesting pronunciation of my name, anyways. Anglophones typically
> whatever phone they have in "man" for the first syllable; do you have [a]
> I do hope [e@] is not meant to be a diphthong!
Of course not! I am not not an extradipthongophiliac. It just looked like a dipthong because I messed up and transcribed the stress wrong. Jake