Re: irregularities
From: | O'Connell James <jamestomas2@...> |
Date: | Monday, June 11, 2001, 16:31 |
Yes, In Britain it would definately be spelt 'spelt'
:)
As would learnt, dreamt etc.
James
--- John Cowan <cowan@...> wrote: >
Christophe Grandsire scripsit:
>
> > Is the spelling "spelt" out-dated? That's the one
> we learn in English classes in
> > France! We also learn that "spelled" can be found,
> but must be considered
> > incorrect in formal writing! What's up with it
> then?
>
> It's archaic in North America, but the standard
> everywhere else, AFAICT.
> It also reflects an actual difference in
> pronunciation, unlike most
> Commonwealth vs. American spelling differences.
> There are a number of irregular weak verbs like
> this: dreamed /drimd/ vs. dreamt
> /drEmpt/, e.g.
>
> --
> John Cowan
> cowan@ccil.org
> One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to
> do/with sparks/galore
> --Douglas Hofstadter
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
Reply