Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: irregularities

From:claudio <claudio.soboll@...>
Date:Sunday, June 10, 2001, 12:21
hi !

weak verbs keep the stem-vowel in all the three forms:
Infinitiv,Präteritum,Partizip Perfekt.

strong verbs dont keep the stem-vowel in all the three forms:
Infinitiv,Präteritum,Partizip Perfekt.

"bringen - brachte"
and
"denken - dachte"

are both strong verbs for me.
i heard nothing about "irregular" verbs, perhaps its a synonym for
strong verbs?

regards,
c.s.

AJ> Sally Caves wrote:
>> > If I remember my numbers correctly, English has 168 irregular verbs. And >> > those are just the ones we use *now*. There are all sorts of archaic >> > irregulars that are no longer used but heavily attested. >> > >> > My favorite irregular series in English: >> > >> > think-thought >> > bring-brought >> > buy-bought >> > work-wrought (the old usage) >> >>Some of these are actually curious formations of the *weak* verb. >>Thencan /thohte are what they call "verbs without middle vowels." >>They are Class I weak verbs that show ablaut change in the >>preterite and past participle but because of the change of >>c/g before d to "ht" they exhibit a modified version of the >>dental ending. >> >>You know, "irregular" verbs is a modern concept. These >>verbs, with the exception of the above, were made from >>Germanic "strong verbs," the prevalent form then (with >>ablaut change to express the preterite and PP). Weak >>verbs, which became our "regular" verbs, were the ones >>formed by a dental ending. By analogy, a lot of our strong >>verbs went weak: "helpan, healp, hulpen, holpen" -- help >>helped helped. >> >> > I like them primarily because they are so transparently cognate with >>German: >> > >> > denken-dachte-gedacht >> > bringen-brachte-gebracht >> > (kaufen and arbeiten are no longer part of the series) >> >>Because of the same formation in proto-Germanic. >> >> > I think that I'll add a web page about irregular verbs in English and >> > German when I've got the time. >> >>Hope this information helps you. It would be best to talk >>about strong and weak verbs rather than "regular" and >>"irregular."
AJ> Hm, when I read German (approx 1995-2000), we were taught to refer to verbs AJ> like _denken_ and _bringen_ as "irregular". The term "strong" was reserved AJ> for verbs like _kommen_ and _helfen_ (that keep the stem consonants AJ> unchanged in inflected forms). AJ> What were our Germans on the list told about this in their schools? AJ> Andreas AJ> _________________________________________________________________________ AJ> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. regards, c.s. "it's harder to simplificate complex things - without losing a a piece of meaning - than complicating simple things."

Reply

Sally Caves <scaves@...>