Re: To Matt Pearson
From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
Date: | Friday, October 26, 2001, 15:36 |
Matthew Pearson scripsit:
> Well, human language is rule-governed, pure and simple,
Except for the parts that aren't. Being a Registered Old Fart (who didn't
know what the connotations of "It's the bomb" are), I use "stank" as the
preterite of "stink", where younger speakers tend to use "stunk". But
I spent quite a long time scratching my head about whether the participle
is also "stank" or whether it is "stunk" in my idiolect. I finally
settled on "stunk", without any too much confidence about it.
Some parts of language are just plain associative, like non-linguistic
memory. Other examples: French or German or Swahili gender,
Chinese or Japanese classifiers, German noun plurals.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan