Re: One language for the world
| From: | Andre Militante <yatland@...> | 
|---|
| Date: | Saturday, June 10, 2000, 2:34 | 
|---|
> > Are they both from regions where cebuano is the
> primary language? What
> >is the situation (linguistic, historical) between
> cebuano and Tagalog? Was
> >it numbers or trading influence that made it a
> contender for the national
> >language?
>
> Cebuano is a part of the Bisayan branch of the
> Philippine languages. This
> paper:
> 
http://www.bisaya.com/papers/context/welcome.html,
> compares
> Malaysian Bisaya, and the Bisayan language group
> (through Cebuano. It also
> shows what languages are in the Bisayan group.
> Cebuano has over 15 million
> speakers and is the Lingua Franca (from what i have
> read) of its region.
> The parent site may have more information than I can
> provide. I think one
> of the reasons it was a contender is because it has
> such a large number of
> native speakers, and Cebu is an important city in
> the Visayas. Though
> Tagalog and Cebuano are related to each other (Both
> in the Meso-Philippine
> group), a speaker who only knows Cebuano and one who
> only knows Tagalog
> wouldn't be able to understand each other.