Re: "Register" a grammatical term

I just wondered if "register" was ever used to
refer to the familiar/honorific axis of grammar.
I seem to remember so but it might be that I
came up with it myself.

BTW, sorry for late answers.  I went of on a
sudden Monday PM--Wednesday AM dash to Germany...

/BP

Mark J. Reed skrev:
> That was my thought, that "grammatical" is being (mis)used (overly)
> broadly.  There are grammatical aspects of register, but its not a
> grammatical phenomenon...
>
>
>
> On 8/18/08, ROGER MILLS <rfmilly@...> wrote:
>> Ray Brown wrote:
>>
>>>>> Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Could someone with access to Trask's and Crystal's
>>>>> lingyuistic dictionaries be so kind to look up how
>>>>> they define "register" as a grammatical term?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Crystal:
>>>> (1) A term used in phonetics to refer to the voice quality produced
>>> [etc. snipped]
>>>
>>> Charlie has given you in full the two definitions given by Crystal. Neither
>>>
>>> of them are, as you will have read, are uses as _grammatical_ terms.
>>>
>> The 2nd def. given by Crystal in Charlie's post accords with my knowledge
>> and use of the term; IIRC it's been in use since at least the 70s, when
>> people like Derek Bickerton began looking seriously at pidgins/creoles (and
>> stigmatized dialects like AAVE) and the associated bi- or poly-dialectism.
>> For example, those Jamaicans (and others Caribbean islanders) who can switch
>> from pure local creole to the Queen's English (and points in between) at the
>> drop of a hat-- and then realized that, well, we all do something like that
>> when the occasion demands.
>>
>> Perhaps "grammatical term" should be interpreted as "term used by linguists"
>> :-))))))
>>
>

Reply