Re: Zero-ness
From: | Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, August 9, 2000, 2:11 |
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Jonathan Chang wrote:
> In a message dated 2000/08/09 01:43:02 AM, hsteoh@QUICKFUR.YI.ORG wrote:
>
> >"Plural nouns" and "singular nouns" are easily understood, but "zero
> >nouns" may be misread to mean no nouns, instead of a noun in its zero
> >number... so I need a better term! Suggestions will be appreciated!
I seem to recall in the FAQ something about a case indicating lack.
Partative? Hmm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Living your life is a task so difficult,
it has never been attempted before.