Re: Zero-ness
From: | Thomas R. Wier <artabanos@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, August 9, 2000, 20:11 |
Lars Henrik Mathiesen wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 12:52:04 -0500
> > From: "Thomas R. Wier" <artabanos@...>
>
> > bjm10@CORNELL.EDU wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Vasiliy Chernov wrote:
> > > > "Nihilar"? :)
> > > > (Don't ask me how to pronounce this in English)
> > > It would end up being something like /ni:-laR/ in my dialect
> > If I had to use it, I would feel compelled to pronounce the <h>,
> > which makes it sound awkward for me. Thus, my resistence of the
> > term.
>
> Well, the Romans themselves dropped the haitch, so shrug off that
> compulsion. Make both nihilar and nilar official spellings and let
> everybody pronounce it like Bryan does.
Heh. Unless I wanted to be ultraprescriptivist, in which case I
would insist on Cato the Elder's use. If it's good enough for
Lucretius, it's good enough for me! :)
======================================
Tom Wier | "Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."
======================================