Re: Abugidas (was: Chinese writing systems)
From: | Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...> |
Date: | Thursday, November 7, 2002, 22:44 |
John Cowan wrote:
> I didn't give any such explanation: someone else did. "Alphasyllabary"
> has been applied in the past to both abugidas and abjads, and I do
> consider it obsolete.
Then, what about a system where some characters are alphabetic and some
are syllabic? For example, Tivets, a provisional descendant of
Uatakassi, uses a script derived from the classic Kassi syllabry, but
some of the characters have come to refer to single phonemes, such as
/C/ or /tS/, while others are syllables, like /tu/, and still others can
be alphabetic or syllabic depending on context, like the same character
is used for /ta/ and syllable-final /ts/. I'm not sure if there are any
natscripts like that, but I would call that constructed script an
alphasyllabry, since neither abjad nor abugida really describes it.
--
"There's no such thing as 'cool'. Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42