Re: satya:graha
From: | Frank George Valoczy <valoczy@...> |
Date: | Saturday, December 1, 2001, 8:30 |
Ah so. I'd put it on the first syllable, but then I know nothing of Indic
languages...
---ferko
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Tristan Alexander McLeay wrote:
> The point was where the stress was, actually.
>
> Tristan
>
> anstouh@yahoo.com.au
>
> War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
> - BSD Games' Fortune
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Frank George Valoczy wrote:
>
> > FWIW I would probably say /sAt^ja:gra:ha:/.
> >
> > ---ferko
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Muke Tever wrote:
> >
> > > From: "Anton Sherwood" <bronto@...>
> > > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, John Cowan wrote:
> > > > > > . . . I have never heard anyone say the word "satyagraha"
> > > > > > (presumably a Hindi borrowing, referring to Gandhi's principles
> > > > > > of passive resistance), but I would surely say /sAtS@'gRAh@/.
> > > >
> > > > Tristan Alexander McLeay wrote:
> > > > > I read that as /"sA:tS@%grA:hA:/,
> > > >
> > > > hm, someone has gone and invented a couple of accent marks
> > > > while I wasn't looking!
> > >
> > > /"/ for primary and /%/ for secondary stress are the standard X-SAMPA marks...
> > >
> > >
> > > *Muke!
> > >
> >
>