Re: Heads up! Wikipedia votes on what a conlang needs to have a page
|From:||Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...>|
|Date:||Monday, August 29, 2005, 19:09|
On 8/29/05, taliesin the storyteller <taliesin-conlang@...> wrote:
If you vote on the policy proposals, please also weigh in
about how the votes should be counted in cases where
no option gets an outright majority.
> Users with logins are better because there's bound to turn up some
> "valid voters must have a zillion provavble edits in wikipedia
You can only vote if you have a user login. So far there
is no specific talk about the login having to already
exist before the vote started, but I suspect that
will come up if several new users vote and their votes
are critical in one or more close cases.
...Mind the gmail Reply-to: field