Re: Conlang book report: The Unfolding of Language
From: | Lars Finsen <lars.finsen@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, January 2, 2007, 0:08 |
Den 1. jan. 2007 kl. 03.25 skrev Amanda Babcock Furrow:
>
> My least favorite part of the book is the last chapter. The author
> attempts to show, in a broad sketch, how language as we know it would
> have developed naturally and inevitably from what he calls the "me
> Tarzan"
> stage to the fully subordinating structure that we have today. He
> illustrates the progress of his thought experiment using a story about
> a father spearing a mammoth to save his daughter.
>
> A mammoth? "Me Tarzan"? I found this section painful to read; I was
> embarrassed for the author. I'd rather get more details on the
> Semitic
> verb system instead.
This makes me curious. I'd like a very brief outline, please. I know
some people have screwed-up ideas about the origin of language. Is he
one of them? Or is it you? Or is it me?
Screwed-up ideas can be entertaining, if nothing else.
LEF
Reply